Patagonia doesn’t want your business

On Black Friday Patagonia ran a full page ad in the New York Times doing the inverse of every other retailer in existence, they told people not to buy their R2 jacket. Not content to just say that, they went on to tell readers exactly why they shouldn’t make the purchase listing the shockingly high environmental impact of each R2 they produce. It’s a bold move centering around their Common Threads Initiative aiming to get consumers to Reduce, Repair, Reuse, Recycle, and Reimagine.

While the campaign and initiative are ripe for calls of hypocrisy, Patagonia hasn’t been shy in proactively  the legitimate claim. It’s an interesting play by a company that truly does seem to care about the environment (as much as a for-profit manufacturer can). I think it’s a bold step forward for the outdoor industry that potentially sets a new benchmark and a line in the sand for other companies pledging a green agenda. What do you think? Is Patagonia walking the walk or just grabbing attention?

More News

| 23rd Sep 2020

DTC as an Experience: Lessons Learned from the Spirits Industry

Like many industries, the spirits category has seen a rise in direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales as the COVID-19 pandemic affects on-premise consumption.

| 22nd Sep 2020

Google’s Firebase – Everything You Need to Know

If you’re working in the cloud computing space, you are likely familiar with or considered using AWS and/or Azure (Amazon’s and Microsoft’s cloud platforms respectively).

| 15th Sep 2020

Pivot Planning Takes Flight

Pivot Planning is increasingly shaping the business agenda in 2020.