Patagonia doesn’t want your business

On Black Friday Patagonia ran a full page ad in the New York Times doing the inverse of every other retailer in existence, they told people not to buy their R2 jacket. Not content to just say that, they went on to tell readers exactly why they shouldn’t make the purchase listing the shockingly high environmental impact of each R2 they produce. It’s a bold move centering around their Common Threads Initiative aiming to get consumers to Reduce, Repair, Reuse, Recycle, and Reimagine.

While the campaign and initiative are ripe for calls of hypocrisy, Patagonia hasn’t been shy in proactively  the legitimate claim. It’s an interesting play by a company that truly does seem to care about the environment (as much as a for-profit manufacturer can). I think it’s a bold step forward for the outdoor industry that potentially sets a new benchmark and a line in the sand for other companies pledging a green agenda. What do you think? Is Patagonia walking the walk or just grabbing attention?

More News

| 27th Mar 2020

Beyond the Headlines, Government’s Digital Response to COVID-19

Today you will read the news about Congress’s stimulus package and all the new services and benefits aimed at both keeping people safe from coronavirus and shoring-up our economy.

| 24th Mar 2020

Moving to the Cloud: Get Started With the Basics

It is always critical to keep the reason why a project is being done in mind at all times, and cloud migrations are no exception to this rule.

| 9th Mar 2020

#EachForEqual

Collectively, each one of us can help create a gender equal world.